A special chapter could be written about rock stacking or stone balancing, the activity whereby people balance rocks on top of each other in order to make unusual shapes or formations. They can in some situations be very impressive. However, there are increasingly more arguments coming to light as to why making cairns in the wilderness, national parks and other valuable areas, is inappropriate at best, or at worst, severely damaging.
People have been marking their trails by stacking rock into piles for thousands of years. The reason is simple: it’s the easiest accessible material and it can last for ages, literally. Even now you can find rock cairns all over the world, from the Himalayas to Iceland, and they genuinely can help people with navigation through wilderness.
A few months ago, when we hiked in Iceland, some of these rock cairns actually helped us to find our way over a big, otherwise unmarked, area of moorland. In these cases, I believe that rock cairns can be justified. On the other hand, rock cairns made by tourists or anyone who felt like stacking a few rocks on top of one another, are not only confusing for hikers, but also could have environmental impacts which many of these “builders” don’t realize.
The ways in which building rock cairns harms the environment are numerous.
The removal of rocks can result erosion once previously covered soil becomes exposed and washed away, the habitats of many animals are disturbed by the removal of rocks, and rock cairn construction can result in the interference or halting of processes which have been going on for thousands of years. Geological time is, after all, too slow for the average human to comprehend. This is particularly relevant for places with a lots of tundra or in alpine areas where stones are connected to the soil by the many invisible threads of plants roots, moss and mushroom spawn. Sadly, this is happening in fragile environments such as parts of Iceland, where disrespectful tourists are going as far as carving their names in moss that could be hundreds of years old.
Another example is perhaps more concerning. In the Krkonoše Mountains, Czechia, in an upper river basin of the river Elbe, tourists are capable of building hundreds of rock cairns every few days. Once the first rock cairn appears, other people copy. They take stones directly from the river basin where the European bullhead, classified as a vulnerable species in Czechia, spawns. Furthermore, many threatened insect species also lay their eggs underneath river stones. The removal of such river stones destroys any chances of these eggs surviving.
Finally, there are the cultural reasons such as the offending of native cultures in Hawaii, and the disturbance of archaeological sites in the UK.
In my opinion, one of the most important reasons for not building rock cairns is the direct contradiction of such activities with the Leave no Trace principle. The whole point of wilderness areas is that they are, to a degree, undisturbed by humans, or at the very least, less disturbed than the majority of inhabited places. We visit these places because of their increasing rarity, and to appreciate their naturalness and how they look without human intervention. I just want to enjoy nature in the most undisturbed state possible. Why do humans always feel that they have the right to leave their mark? Why, oh why, can we not just leave it alone?
There is a time and a place for balancing rocks on one another. Anna has recently returned from walking the Camino de Santiago de Compostela, possibly one of the most densely rock cairned routes in existence. However, the Camino doesn’t pass through fragile wilderness, and the history of stacking rocks has historical and cultural significance for the pilgrims who previously made shrines out of rocks for various reasons. However, similar practices such as the excessive discarding of personal items and the graffiti carved into trees can not be excused. Similarly, there is simply no excuse for the human arrogance that drives the creation of rock cairns in otherwise untouched areas of nature.
It is time for humans for stop leaving their mark. Haven’t we done enough?
Common sense tells me this is a far left thinking. For thousands of years people even cave men left signs. The national parks have disturbed more ground by building paths, bridges and roads. If a bear crosses a stream does he move rocks. Does big rains into creeks not move more rocks than people do. Come on and use some common sense.
I’ve hiked in the English Lake District for sixty years and I like cairns. They are part of the cultural landscape and a mark of communal effort. They can be very helpful in misty conditions, which we get often, and have probably saved many lives by helping walkers find their way. Most areas described as wildernesses are actually cultural landscapes – the Lake District, for example is farmed. In many national parks in the US, populations of Native Americans were evicted from the parks to create ‘pristine’ wilderness that was nothing of the sort. Take a look at https://www.williamcronon.net/writing/Trouble_with_Wilderness_Main.html
Hi Michal, I fully agree with you. As a nature lover and protector, I would like to share with you that in my country -Serbia, many unspoiled and clean rivers have been destroyed with MHE (mini hydro power plants). In order to get green energy, government is completely devastatiting the eco system, the river is put into the pipe, fish dies etc. We are trying to stop it since more than 500 of these MHE are still to be built and there is a group of more than 70,000 people protesting and trying to save the nature or what has left. The group name is “Odbranimo reke Stare planine”, which means protect the rivers of “Stara mountain”. If you come to hike in Serbia, you would most probably see a river and after this “green factory”, only dry rocks and sand. We have huge support from academic institutions, mountaineering organizations, community, etc. However, not much can be done since the government is profit only oriented for the sake of nature destruction. Serbia has beautiful nature and amazing trails, even two European trails pass the country (E4 and E7). Please share and as a nature lover, no matter where it is on this planet Earth, we should all be united to protect it. Alex
Hi Alex,
I definitely agree with you. The green energy is important for sure but we should be doing it wisely with long-term, sustainable vision. I’m currently living in Scotland and here it’s wind farms what causes many debates. But I think wind farms are possibly not as destructive to ecosystems as hydro power plants.
I’d love to come to Serbia to hike for sure. I’m hoping that the next spring is my time to come but we’ll see 🙂
Keep doing what you’re doing!